Releasing Prisoners with Blood on their Hands

In spite of Israel’s insistence that she would not agree to any pre-conditions for a resumption of peace talks with the Palestinian Authority, the government voted today in favour of releasing 104 security prisoners, and that prior to the first meeting between the Israeli and Palestinian negotiators.

The decision was a painful one, because the list of those to be freed includes many who were given multiple life sentences following being found guilty of the murder of innocent men, women and children.

According to news reports, those to be released will include the murderer of Rachel Weiss, who was burned to death with her three small children when the bus in which they were travelling from Tiberius to Jerusalem was ambushed. She died trying to save her children from the flames.

Also to be released is the murderer of Ofra and Tal Moses. A Molotov cocktail was hurled at their car. Ofra Moses, who was pregnant at the time, died in the burning car while her son, Tal, who was fatally injured, died in hospital several months later.

Were the release of these terrorists to be the first stage in a process that would lead to a peace agreement with the Palestinians, the price would be worth paying. However, the indications are that the thinking behind Israel’s decision to release these prisoners was totally different.

There is growing concern about Israel’s deteriorating position on the international political stage. Anxiety has also been expressed that an increasing number of security incidents over the past months could lead to a third Intifada. The time is also fast approaching when a decision will have to be made as to what action should be taken as Iran moves ever closer to becoming a nuclear power.

Israel cannot afford to be at odds with the United States at such a critical time and, therefore, had no alternative but to agree to the framework negotiated by US Secretary of State Kerry.

It isn’t easy to release prisoners with blood on their hands, but given the overall situation, there was no other option.

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in International Criticism, Iran, Peace Negotiations. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Releasing Prisoners with Blood on their Hands

  1. Rabbi Shaul(Paul) R feinberg says:

    absolutely agreed. Thank you Mickey for articulating this well
    shaul r feinberg

  2. zalman says:

    “Israel cannot afford to be at odds with the United States at such a critical time and, therefore, had no alternative but to agree to the framework negotiated by US Secretary of State Kerry.” What does that say about Kerry?
    The Palestinians demanded the release of terrorrists, instead of say, a new hospital. What does that say about the prospects for “peace’?
    “Anxiety has also been expressed that an increasing number of security incidents over the past months could lead to a third Intifada.” The release of terrorists obviously wreaks havoc with the victim’s families. And the justice process. It is also likely to have the effect of further increasing the number of security incidents: missile attacks and “minor” incidents like rock throwing and stabbing.
    “It isn’t easy to release prisoners with blood on their hands, but given the overall situation, there was no other option.” Well, Kerry helped create the overall situation. The other option was to tell the Palestinians: your demand is an injustice, abhorrent and does not promote peace.

    • Rabbi Michael (Micky) Boyden says:

      I think Livny is in Washington negotiating with Saeb Erekat because Israel had no alternative. International public opinion is against her. The Palestinians would have turned to the UN for recognition, and anxiety was being expressed by security experts about the likelihood of a 3rd intifada. Taking all of that into account and Israel’s need for American support during the coming months in terms of action to be taken against Iran, this was the only possible way to go. I don’t believe for a moment that Netanyahu’s government would have taken this course of action unless it felt there was no alternative. Many people are angry that President Obama did not agree to release Pollard and state quite rightly that America would never consider releasing terrorists who acted against her citizens or interests. However, little Israel is not America. In any event, there are few in Israel who believe that these talks will lead anywhere.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s